Case alert: Controversial business practices by Vattenfall's subsidaries in Germany
Greenpeace Germany vs Vattenfall
29 10 2009
On October 29 2009 Greenpeace Germany has lodged an OECD Guidelines complaint at the German NCP against Vattenfall AB and its German subsidiaries Vattenfall Europe AG, Vattenfall Europe Generation AG & Co. KG and Kernkraftwerk Kruemmel GmbH & Co. oHG for violations concerning environmental policies, consumer protection, disclosure and unreasonable lobbying by the company in Germany.
Vattenfall AB is a Swedish joint stock company
owned by the Swedish government. The German companies
Vattenfall Europe AG, Vattenfall Europe Generation AG & Co. KG and
Kernkraftwerk Kruemmel GmbH & Co. oHG are subsidiaries of
Vattenfall AB. The Greenpeace complaint against Vattenfall deals with
different issuess: the Vattenfall coal power plant in Hamburg Moorburg,
the nuclear power plant in Kruemmel in the state of Schleswig-Holstein,
Vattenfall's policy of disclosure during various
malfunctions and accidents in the Kruemmel power plant and the lobbying practices by the company.
The main point at issue is
the Hamburg-Moorburg coal-fired power plant with which Vattenfall is
thought to violate the OECD Guidelines, in particular those concerning
national environmental policies and consumer protection. Vattenfall is
attempting to undermine German environmental law by filing a complaint
with the World Bank arbitration tribunal ICSID. Vattenfall is demanding
EUR 1.4 billion in compensation from the German government because of
the environmental standards imposed on Moorburg. Greenpeace has
calculated that Moorburg emissions will exceed levels necessary for
sustainable development by more than five times. While Vattenfall
claims in its public relations campaign, “Climate Manifesto”, that it
is committed to climate protection issues, in Germany the company
generates the highest levels of CO2 emissions per kilowatt/hour. The
Moorburg coal-fired power plant now under construction, is expected to
use up nearly 10 percent of the German energy industry’s CO2 budget in
its projected 40 years of operation, while generating only a scant two
percent of the total amount of energy produced.
Furthermore, Greenpeace claims the
company applies double standards. While in Sweden Vattenfall is
particularly committed to renewable energy sources, in Germany the
company concentrates on generating coal energy, which is
environmentally harmful.
Read more about the case in the OECD Watch case database.