BIRD vs. Jaguar Land Rover

Allégations

HPG’s human rights impact in Bahrain

Les directives pertinentes de l’OCDE

• Chapitre II
• Chapitre II Paragraphe A10
• Chapitre II Paragraphe A11
• Chapitre II Paragraphe A12
• Chapitre II Paragraphe A2
• Chapter II Paragraph A7
• Chapitre IV
• Chapitre IV Paragraphe 2
• Chapitre IV Paragraphe 3
• Chapitre IV Paragraphe 4
• Chapitre IV Paragraphe 5
• Chapitre IV Paragraphe 6

Résultat

In its initial assessment, published on 8 November 2018, the NCP decided to allow the complaint against HPG in relation to the recommendation that businesses should seek ways to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts linked to their business operation or by their business relationships. It has offered its good offices for a process of mediation. If the parties will not be able to reach a mediated solution, the NCP will conduct its own research into the issues, the findings of which will be presented in a final statement.

The NCP rejected the parts of the complaint that relate to Jaguar Land Rover and Rolex, since in its view the companies are not sufficiently linked to the party causing the harm for the guidelines to apply.

Plus de détails

Complaints connexes

• BIRD vs. Rolex

Documents

• initial assessment

  8 November 2018

  The UK NCP publishes its initial assessment in which it rejects the case against Jaguar Land Rover

  NCP UK
• fichier

  11 April 2018

  Complaint filed at the UK NCP

  BIRD