OECD Watch Logo
  • Our work

    Our work

    Our strategy

    • Strengthening access to justice
    • Promoting progressive OECD policy
    • Supporting accountability rules

    Our issues

    • Due diligence
    • Human rights
    • Just transition
    • Remedy
    • Other issues
  • Guidelines & complaints

    Guidelines & complaints

    NCPs & complaints

    • About NCPs
    • Find your NCP
    • Step-by-step complaints guide
    • Get filing advice

    OECD and corporate accountability

    • About the OECD
    • The OECD Guidelines
    • Guidelines and the law
    • OECD Accession

    Databases

    • Complaints database
    • NCP Evaluations
  • News & publications
  • Our network
  • About us

    About us

    • About OECD Watch
    • Support us
    • Our team and vacancies
    • Governance
    • Contact us
  • Subscribe
Filter content type
Topics
  • Promoting progressive OECD policy
    • OECD Accession
    • OECD Guidelines
  • Strengthening access to justice
    • Complaints
    • NCPs
  • Supporting accountability rules
    • CSDDD & Guidelines Alignment
Home Accessibility

News / 18th February 2025

Case-handling procedures

Complainants depend on clear complaint procedures to access and use the NCP. To ensure an accessible, impartial, and predictable complaint process, the NCP should create case-handling procedures and post them on its website in both…

News / 18th February 2025

Complaint filing guidance

In order to ensure the NCP is accessible, it is important that the NCP provide an adequate and accessible explanation to complainants on how to file complaints. Complainants are likely not experts on the Guidelines,…

News / 18th February 2025

Language accessibility

In order to ensure the NCP is accessible, it is important that language is not a barrier to filing complaints or participating in mediation. Many complainants may only be able to file complaints and participate…

News / 18th February 2025

Coordination between NCPs

Having a clear process for when and how the NCP coordinates with other NCPs when handling complaints helps ensure the process is transparent and predictable. This information helps complainants who have filed, or are considering…

News / 18th February 2025

Admissibility criteria

An NCP should be accessible to enable more parties to benefit from the NCP’s mediation. The Guidelines set out six admissibility criteria that the NCP should consider. NCPs should consider all six of these criteria…

News / 18th February 2025

Evidentiary standard

Many NCPs apply an overly rigorous standard for substantiation at the initial assessment phase, rejecting complaints they think lack adequate substantiation. Especially at the early initial assessment stage of the process, NCPs should endeavour to…

News / 18th February 2025

Parallel proceedings

The Guidelines discourage NCPs from rejecting complaints subject to parallel proceedings in judicial courts or other tribunals. The Guidelines permit rejection only when the NCP’s handling of the complaint will seriously prejudice either of the…

News / 18th February 2025

Independent expert structure

OECD Watch’s view, based on years of analysis, is that handling of cases by non-governmental (independent) experts has typically resulted in stronger outcomes and generated greater confidence among civil society. Examples of this include NCPs…

News / 18th February 2025

Financial resources

An NCP must have sufficient financial resources to both conduct promotional activities and handle cases. By setting a dedicated budget for the NCP, the government is making a commitment and grants foresight to the NCP…

News / 18th February 2025

Staffing resources

In order to carry out its mandate, an NCP must have sufficient human resources. Understaffing leads to constraints in the amount of promotional activities an NCP can organise/participate in or delays in case handling. It…

Subscribe to our newsletter

Subscribe

Follow us on socials

Visit our Bluesky page Visit our LinkedIn page

Our work

  • Strengthening access to justice
  • Promoting progressive OECD policy
  • Supporting accountability rules

Key resources

  • Complaints database
  • NCP Evaluations
  • Step-by-step complaints guide
  • Get filing advice

About us

  • Our network
  • About OECD Watch
  • News & publications
  • Our team and vacancies
  • Contact us
Copyright © 2026 OECD Watch
  • Translations
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
Cookies & Privacy
We use cookies to optimise your experience and improve our website.
Functional Always active
These cookies are required in order to use the website. They ensure that the website works properly and that your user preferences remain known. For example, they save you from having to enter the same information every time you visit our website. We may set these cookies without your consent.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
These cookies track your online activity to help advertisers deliver more relevant advertising or to limit how many times you see an ad. Marketing cookies may share that information with other websites, organisations or advertisers.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
Preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
English
French Spanish Arabic Portuguese