As a member of OECD Watch and the U.S. NCP’s Stakeholder Advisory Board, we are encouraged by its recent efforts to improve clarity around the specific instance process, engage with various stakeholders, including U.S. embassies, and respond to many of the recommendations contained in the Board’s 2014 report. We also commend the U.S. Department of State for allocating additional staff and resources to the U.S. NCP. However, the U.S. NCP still falls short from realizing its obligations. Despite many recent positive changes, it fails to keep step with its counterparts abroad, implement best practice, and provide meaningful and effective access to remedy.
read more lessrelated content
News /
Retaliation must be prevented in relation to the Mapuche-Williche vs. Statkraft NCP complaint
OECD Watch has received concerning reports from complainants of increased public exposure of Indigenous representatives and civil society filing a National Contact Point (NCP) complaint and separate legal complaint against Norwegian renewable energy company Statkraft,…
Sign up
Stay up-to-date with the OECD Watch newsletter
Publication /
OECD Watch’s submission for NCP Korea, Japan and Croatia’s peer reviews
Publication /
State of Remedy 2025
Annual analysis of community and NGO-led National Contact Point complaints concluded in 2025
Download
Publication /
OECD Watch’s submission for NCP Costa Rica and Lithuania’s peer reviews
Publication /
Voices and SIRGE Coalition’s Handbook for Filing NCP Complaints Against Harmful Business Practices
A practical guide for Indigenous Peoples on using the OECD Guidelines to protect their rights
Download
Publication /
OECD Watch’s submission for NCP Argentina, Italy, and Uruguay’s peer reviews
Publication /
OECD Watch’s submission for NCP Norway and Switzerland’s peer reviews
Publication /
State of Remedy 2024
Analysing community and NGO-led complaints concluded in 2024
Download
Publication /