OECD Watch Logo
  • Our work

    Our work

    Our strategy

    • Strengthening access to justice
    • Promoting progressive OECD policy
    • Supporting accountability rules

    Our issues

    • Due diligence
    • Human rights
    • Just transition
    • Remedy
    • Other issues
  • Guidelines & complaints

    Guidelines & complaints

    NCPs & complaints

    • About NCPs
    • Find your NCP
    • Step-by-step complaints guide
    • Get filing advice

    OECD and corporate accountability

    • About the OECD
    • The OECD Guidelines
    • Guidelines and the law
    • OECD Accession

    Databases

    • Complaints database
    • NCP Evaluations
  • News & publications
  • Our network
  • About us

    About us

    • About OECD Watch
    • Support us
    • Our team and vacancies
    • Governance
    • Contact us
  • Subscribe
Filter content type
Topics
  • Promoting progressive OECD policy
    • OECD Accession
    • OECD Guidelines
  • Strengthening access to justice
    • Complaints
    • NCPs
  • Supporting accountability rules
    • CSDDD & Guidelines Alignment
Home Impartiality & Equitability Page 2

News / 18th February 2025

Procedural review

Complainants should have the right to request a procedural review if they feel the NCP has not followed its internal procedures correctly and fairly. This enables more predictable, impartial complaint-handling and helps strengthen the practices…

News / 18th February 2025

Stakeholder involvement in complaints

NCPs should always involve core stakeholders in their decision making on complaints. Complainants feel more trust in an NCP’s impartiality when its complaint-handling is guided by all three stakeholder groups evenly.

News / 18th February 2025

Independent expert structure

OECD Watch’s view, based on years of analysis, is that handling of cases by non-governmental (independent) experts has typically resulted in stronger outcomes and generated greater confidence among civil society. Examples of this include NCPs…

News / 18th February 2025

Location in bureaucracy

NCPs located in economics or trade ministries, especially in trade promotion ministries, are distrusted by civil society who perceive that their staff operate with an innate conflict of interest, working both to advance business activity…

News / 18th February 2025

Reprisals against complainants

Intimidation and reprisals against complainants can often prevent complainants from filing a complaint or from being able to participate fully in the process. Ensuring that the NCP has a robust policy and practice to address…

News / 18th February 2025

Mediation location

NCP processes should be as open, accessible, and affordable as possible, so that complainants from around the world can access and use the NCP mechanism. Complainants may have cost or security concerns that prevent them…

News / 18th February 2025

Stakeholder advisory body

NCPs are strongest when they are regularly advised by all three core stakeholder groups, as this gives them access to wider expertise. Having a stakeholder advisory body can also increase stakeholders’ and complainants’ trust in…

News / 18th February 2025

Reprisals against NCP

Intimidation and reprisals against NCPs can result in complaints being incorrectly rejected or handled improperly. To ensure the accountability, predictability, and equitability and impartiality of the complaint process, NCPs should take a proactive approach to…

News / 18th February 2025

Company naming

It is important that NCPs not allow companies to remain anonymous simply for reputational concerns. Anonymity must be used only in situations where there are security risks. Ensuring companies are publicly named can encourage the…

News / 4th February 2025

Transparency between complaint parties

Transparency is a core criterion for NCPs and is critical to ensuring a predictable, impartial, and equitable complaint process. Complainants must have access to all information relevant to the complaint to avoid power imbalances. NCPs…

Subscribe to our newsletter

Subscribe

Follow us on socials

Visit our Bluesky page Visit our LinkedIn page

Our work

  • Strengthening access to justice
  • Promoting progressive OECD policy
  • Supporting accountability rules

Key resources

  • Complaints database
  • NCP Evaluations
  • Step-by-step complaints guide
  • Get filing advice

About us

  • Our network
  • About OECD Watch
  • News & publications
  • Our team and vacancies
  • Contact us
Copyright © 2026 OECD Watch
  • Translations
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy statement
  • Cookie Policy
Cookies & Privacy
We use cookies to optimise your experience and improve our website.
Functional Always active
These cookies are required in order to use the website. They ensure that the website works properly and that your user preferences remain known. For example, they save you from having to enter the same information every time you visit our website. We may set these cookies without your consent.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
These cookies track your online activity to help advertisers deliver more relevant advertising or to limit how many times you see an ad. Marketing cookies may share that information with other websites, organisations or advertisers.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
Preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
English
French Spanish Arabic Portuguese